You Don’t Have Good Taste
I mean, no offense, but you probably don’t — at least not in the way people traditionally talk about it.
When we say someone “has good taste,” what we usually mean is that their choices feel coherent, intentional, refined. Nothing feels accidental. But good taste is not a fixed aesthetic. It isn’t pink or minimalist or conceptual or figurative. It doesn’t belong to a single style, palette, or movement. In fact, people with what we call “good taste” often express themselves in wildly different ways. What they share is not a look, but clarity. They understand their own orientation well enough to express it cleanly, and that clarity reads as elegance.
Preference, however, does not equal taste. Preference is immediate. You like a color. You’re drawn to a composition. You respond to a mood. There is nothing wrong with that. But preference is unstable. It shifts with environment, emotion, and trend.
Even louder is impulse. The cultural messaging is relentless: go with your gut, trust your instincts. I don’t necessarily agree — not at the beginning.
When it comes to developing an art collection — and learning how to develop taste in art more broadly — you cannot trust your instincts until you’ve built the foundation from which those instincts arise. Untrained instinct is often just impulse. It feels decisive and brave. It feels convincing. But it is frequently just intensity masquerading as insight.
I have felt this myself and watched clients experience it many times. A work overwhelms the senses and feels like love at first sight. But intensity fades. The question that matters is simpler: will you still want to live with it in five years? If that question makes you uneasy, that unease is information.
Pattern Is Trained Instinct
Real instinct is quieter, and it rests on repetition. When someone is said to have “good instincts,” what we are actually seeing is practiced judgment. They understand their point of view well enough to make decisions within it — and within the larger art market for new collectors and seasoned buyers alike. That kind of instinct does not appear spontaneously. It develops through exposure. This is why art professionals consistently advise new collectors to look at as much art as possible. Learning how to look well is the foundation of everything that follows. The advice is less romantic than it sounds. You are training your eye.
When you begin to notice that you are repeatedly drawn to something — across artists, across spaces, across time — and then encounter a work that brings that pattern into sharp focus, the feeling can be powerful. Not because it is sudden, but because it snaps everything into place. That is trained instinct revealing itself.
Once something continues to draw you back, you are no longer operating in the realm of impulse. You are in the realm of pattern. Pattern is trained instinct. It is what remains when novelty fades. And pattern rarely lives on the surface.
It is not about whether you “like pink” or “prefer abstraction.” Taste in art operates at a deeper register. It lives in the emotional temperature you gravitate toward, the psychological tension you can tolerate, the themes you return to, and the way certain artists situate themselves within the broader story of their time and place.
You may think you collect landscapes, but perhaps what you are actually drawn to is solitude. You may believe you prefer abstraction, but perhaps what resonates is openness or ambiguity. Good taste is not about consistent color or subject matter. It is about consistent orientation.
This is why tracking what repeats matters. Not because it makes you look sophisticated, but because it allows you to move with intention. Much art collecting advice focuses on what to buy. Far less attention is given to how to think — or to how to build an art collection that holds up over time.
In certain parts of the art world, intention is legible. Galleries notice coherence. Serious artists value collectors who understand what they are responding to and why. You do not need to perform expertise — performance often shuts down conversation. Curiosity keeps it open. But you do need to understand your own through-line. Clarity reads.
When someone appears to have “good taste,” what you are actually witnessing is honed instinct — not loud or reactive, but observed, tested, and refined over time. Taste is not about buying the same thing repeatedly. It is about understanding the deeper logic behind your choices so that you can express it across different works, different mediums, and even different chapters of your life.
The elegance lies in coherence, not sameness. One of the criteria I use when distinguishing good from great artists is their ability to express their ideas in multiple ways. The same is true for collectors.
You don’t have good taste. You have a pattern.
The question is whether you’re paying attention to it.
Every collector has a type.
A default way of engaging with art — and a default reason they walk away from something they should have bought. Find out yours in two minutes.
Take the Quiz →Already a member? This week's new additions to The Collection are waiting.
Explore The Collection →